Monitor whether any actual 'Anti-Weaponization' fund materializes with government resources or tax-exempt status, and track if Trump's legal fees are being paid through mechanisms that blur personal/official lines.
This is a classic preemptive denial with minimal governance substance but high distraction value. The A-score is low because it's merely a statement denying coordination—no actual policy change or institutional lever is activated. The B-score is high due to massive media-volume mismatch (denying allegations generates coverage without substance), strategic timing alongside actual rule-of-law events (SDNY appointment, Halkbank drop), and pattern-matching the 'deny collusion' playbook. The intentionality score of 9/15 triggers full strategic weight.