Track whether these 'processing delays' become formalized policy changes or remain informal obstruction—the difference determines reversibility and whether this becomes reusable administrative sabotage precedent.
This scores as MIXED with slight B dominance (B=35, A=33, D=-2). The constitutional harm is real but moderate: using administrative delays weaponizes regulatory process (rule_of_law=1, separation=2) and represents institutional capture of energy policy (capture=3). However, it's policy-reversible and lacks the severity multipliers of election/judicial interference. The B-score reflects moderate culture-war bait around climate policy with strong pattern-match to anti-renewable playbook, though coverage volume doesn't dramatically exceed governance substance.