This is classic geopolitical threat rhetoric with no concrete mechanism for constitutional damage. A-score: Violence driver scores 3 for military threat escalation, separation scores 2 for potential war powers implications, rule_of_law scores 1 for international norms tension. However, mechanism_modifier is 0.5 (no actual constitutional mechanism, just foreign threat), scope_modifier 0.8 (international with indirect US impact). Severity multipliers near 1.0 as rhetoric is reversible and not unprecedented. Final A=2.51. B-score: Layer 1 scores high on outrage_bait (8, war threats), media_friendliness (9, conflict narrative), moderate on novelty (3, routine Iran-US tensions). Layer 2 shows mismatch (7, threat severity vs actual constitutional impact), pattern_match (8, familiar geopolitical theater). Intentionality at 9 (state actor posturing, predictable escalation cycle, media amplification). Final B=27.58. Delta=-25.07 strongly indicates List B: high distraction value, minimal constitutional substance.