This event scores high on constitutional damage (46.17) due to significant institutional capture (5/5) - political pressure on CDC scientific independence represents regulatory capture by ideology. Separation of powers concerns (4/5) arise from executive branch interference in independent public health agency scientific processes. Civil rights impact (4/5) reflects potential harm to newborn health outcomes and parental rights to evidence-based medical care. Rule of law (3/5) reflects deviation from established scientific consensus processes. Policy change mechanism adds 1.3x modifier, federal scope 1.2x. Severity multipliers: durability 1.2 (policy changes persist), reversibility 0.9 (technically reversible but creates precedent), precedent 1.3 (opens door to political interference in vaccination schedules). B-score (31.68) is elevated by high media friendliness (9/10) - vaccine controversy is highly reportable, outrage bait (8/10) targeting parental fears, novelty (7/10) of federal anti-vaccine policy shift. Layer 2 shows pattern matching (9/10) with RFK Jr. appointment and anti-vaccine movement, narrative pivot potential (8/10), and mismatch (7/10) between public health emergency preparedness rhetoric and undermining preventive medicine. Intentionality indicators present (coordinated with broader anti-vaccine agenda, timing with administration transition). Delta of +14.49 indicates genuine constitutional concern despite hype amplification.