FBI Director using personal defamation suit against media critic represents significant constitutional concern. Rule_of_law (4.5): FBI Director leveraging position while pursuing legal action against press creates appearance of weaponization and chilling effect on critical journalism. Separation (4.2): Blurs line between personal legal action and official capacity when nation's top law enforcement officer sues media outlet. Civil_rights (3.8): Direct threat to press freedom and First Amendment protections. Capture (3.5): Suggests institutional capture where FBI leadership acts against democratic norms of press freedom. Information_operation mechanism adds 25% (intimidation of media ecosystem). Federal scope with narrow population (journalists/critics) adds 15%. Precedent severity high (1.3) as normalizes law enforcement leaders suing critics. D-score: +8.7 indicates primarily constitutional damage with moderate hype overlay. B-score elevated by outrage (7.5) and media_friendliness (8.5) but doesn't overcome substantive institutional threat.