Monitor which businesses receive tariff refunds and whether there are patterns of favoritism toward Trump-connected entities or campaign donors.
This is primarily administrative infrastructure for existing tariff policy with minimal constitutional harm (corruption driver scored 2/5 for potential favoritism in refund decisions, but no evidence yet). The coverage-to-substance ratio is high—framing a government portal launch as 'America's hottest website' generates media buzz disproportionate to governance impact. The novelty and media-friendliness drive B-score while actual constitutional damage remains speculative.