Monitor whether this exhibit dispute escalates to actual enforcement mechanisms (funding threats, personnel actions, legal orders) that would elevate constitutional risk, or remains symbolic posturing.
This scores as List B distraction. While there's modest constitutional concern around federal interference with historical interpretation (civil_rights=2, capture=2, separation=1), the mechanism is norm_erosion_only with no enforcement lever, making it easily reversible. The distraction score is high (58) due to strong outrage-bait on racial history, excellent media panel fodder, and timing overlap with the Supreme Court blocking Trump's voter data collection—a significantly higher-A governance action. The 46-point dominance margin (B-A) clearly flags this as strategic distraction.