Trump attends White House Correspondents' Dinner after April assassination attempt

This event describes a routine, scheduled public appearance (the rescheduled White House Correspondents' Dinner) with no discernible mechanism of constitutional harm—no election interference, rule-of-law breach, separation-of-powers issue, civil rights impact, institutional capture, corruption, or violence. All A-score drivers score zero, yielding a final A-score of 0. The coverage is heavily media-driven, focusing on rhetorical framing ('unifying yet vicious') and Trump's relationship with the press, producing moderate hype/novelty value (repeated identical headlines, high media attendance) but low strategic or narrative-pivot significance since it does not obscure or distract from any major policy or crisis event. Layer 2 intentionality indicators suggest low covert strategic intent—this is a normal press/political tradition, not a deliberate distraction operation. The resulting B-score (~33) exceeds the noise threshold and satisfies List B criteria (B>=25, D<=-10), reflecting a low-substance, high-visibility media event rather than a governance-relevant action.