Administrative funding freeze affecting climate grants across multiple states. A-score: Election impact (2) reflects policy reversal of prior administration priorities. Rule of law (3) captures executive discretion over appropriated funds and potential impoundment concerns. Separation (2) for unilateral executive action on congressionally authorized programs. Civil rights (1) minimal direct impact. Capture (3) reflects fossil fuel industry alignment and reversal of environmental policy. Corruption (1) low absent evidence of personal enrichment. Violence (0) none. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for resource reallocation affecting approved grants. Scope modifier 1.1 for multi-state moderate population. Severity: durability 1.0 (likely temporary), reversibility 0.9 (administratively reversible), precedent 1.1 (establishes pattern for funding freezes). Final A: 21.45. B-score: Layer 1 generates moderate hype - outrage bait (6) for climate/environmental angle, meme_ability (3) limited, novelty (4) somewhat routine for administration changes, media friendliness (7) strong environmental coverage. Layer 2: mismatch (5) moderate policy-hype gap, timing (6) early administration action, narrative_pivot (4) fits broader deregulation story, pattern_match (7) predictable partisan response. Intentionality (8) clear partisan wedge issue with predictable outrage. Final B: 22.69. Classification: Both scores below 25 threshold. Routine administrative action with limited constitutional mechanism and high reversibility. Generates predictable partisan response but lacks durability or precedential weight for List A. Noise classification appropriate for routine policy implementation.