This event scores 8.4 on constitutional damage (A) and 27.1 on distraction/hype (B), yielding D=-18.7, classifying as List B. A-score: Moderate rule_of_law impact (3.0) from criminal indictment of political candidate, modest election interference (2.5) as candidate faces charges during campaign, minor civil_rights (1.5) and violence (1.0) components. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 15% modifier, single_state scope reduces by 15%. Low durability (0.9) as individual prosecution, fully reversible through legal process. B-score: High Layer 1 (14.3/25) driven by outrage_bait (7.5) - progressive candidate vs ICE creates tribal flashpoint, media_friendliness (7.0) - perfect culture war narrative, moderate meme_ability (6.0) and novelty (5.5). Layer 2 (12.8/20) shows pattern_match (7.0) with selective prosecution narratives, narrative_pivot (6.5) enabling both law-and-order and political persecution frames, mismatch (6.0) between protest activity and conspiracy charges. Intentionality indicators (8/15) include political_targeting_timing of candidate indictment, selective_enforcement_pattern against progressive activist, narrative_framing emphasizing 'far-left' and 'raucous'. The event is primarily a culture war amplification vehicle (progressive/ICE/protest) with limited actual constitutional impact from a single state-level prosecution.