Distinguish between accountability news (past actors facing consequences) and active threat news (current constitutional erosion). This event shows the system working, not breaking.
This is a judicial accountability action AGAINST someone who attempted constitutional harm in 2020, not a new constitutional threat. The disbarment represents the legal system functioning correctly (rule of law restoration, not erosion). While it generates moderate media attention due to Eastman's notoriety, it's a backward-looking consequence with no current governance mechanism or institutional lever. This is noise—a spectacle about past accountability rather than present constitutional damage.