A-score: High constitutional damage across multiple vectors. Election integrity (3.5) - rhetoric delegitimizes political opposition and electoral process. Rule of law (4.0) - accusing lawmakers of capital crimes without due process undermines legal norms. Separation of powers (3.0) - executive threatening legislative branch. Civil rights (3.5) - chilling effect on political speech and opposition. Violence (4.5) - explicit invocation of death penalty creates threat environment. Mechanism modifier 0.75 for norm_erosion_only reduces impact as no formal action taken, but precedent severity 1.2 reflects dangerous normalization of violent rhetoric against political opponents. Base 52.95 * 0.75 * 1.1 * 1.0 * 1.2 = 43.68. B-score: Extremely high outrage potential (9.5) - death penalty accusations against lawmakers. Strong media amplification (9.0) - inflammatory language guarantees coverage. Layer 2 shows strategic pattern - mismatch (8.0) between rhetoric severity and actual threat, pattern match (8.5) with established playbook of escalating accusations. Intentionality 11/15 for repeat pattern from known actor with suspicious timing. Final 33.93. D-score: +9.75 indicates both substantial damage AND significant hype, qualifying as Mixed (both scores >25, |D|<10).