Oak Flat land transfer denial represents substantive constitutional concern. Civil_rights (4.0): Indigenous sacred site protection involves First Amendment religious freedom and treaty rights - judicial denial of injunction removes procedural safeguard for Apache religious practices. Rule_of_law (3.5): Judicial decision allows land transfer under 2014 congressional rider attached to defense bill, raising questions about proper legislative process and judicial deference to questionable statutory mechanisms. Separation (2.0): Congressional rider mechanism bypassed normal environmental review and tribal consultation processes. Capture (3.0): Land transfer to Resolution Copper (Rio Tinto subsidiary) via legislative rider suggests corporate influence over public lands policy. Mechanism_modifier 1.15 for judicial action with precedential implications for sacred sites and public lands. Scope_modifier 0.85 for single-state impact but affects broader indigenous rights framework. Severity: durability 1.2 (land transfer difficult to reverse once mining begins), reversibility 0.9 (some appellate options remain), precedent 1.1 (sets framework for sacred site vs. extraction conflicts). A-score 26.3 crosses threshold. B-score 13.8: moderate outrage (indigenous rights + environmental angle), limited meme potential, some media coverage but technical legal story. Delta +12.5 clearly indicates List A.