State-level enforcement cooperation directive with federal immigration priorities. A-score: rule_of_law (2.5) reflects federalism tensions and potential selective enforcement; separation (2) for state-federal coordination dynamics; civil_rights (3) for due process concerns in deportation cooperation; capture (1.5) for political alignment signaling. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 15% modifier, single_state scope reduces by 15%. Severity: slightly durable (1.1) as policy directive, highly reversible (0.95) by next governor, modest precedent (1.05) for state cooperation models. Final A=16.73. B-score: High outrage_bait (75) on immigration polarization, strong media_friendliness (70) for coverage, moderate meme_ability (45), lower novelty (30) as state cooperation not unprecedented. Layer 2: strong timing (8) in Trump administration context, pattern_match (8) to broader immigration enforcement narrative, mismatch (6) between constitutional federalism concerns and political theater, narrative_pivot (7) for state-level immigration positioning. Intentionality (9) evident in political signaling and coordinated messaging. Final B=36.89. Delta=-20.16 indicates List B classification: significant hype around routine state-federal cooperation that lacks major constitutional damage mechanisms.