This scores as a clear List A constitutional damage event. The A-score of 62.1 reflects severe constitutional implications: rule_of_law (5) for executive agency claiming authority to bypass judicial warrant requirements violating Fourth Amendment protections; civil_rights (5) for direct assault on privacy rights and due process protections for broad population; separation (4) for executive branch asserting power traditionally requiring judicial oversight; capture (3) for agency self-authorization expanding its own powers; corruption (2) for institutional overreach; violence (2) for coercive entry authority. High severity multipliers (durability 1.2, reversibility 1.1, precedent 1.3) reflect that memo creates durable policy framework, difficult to reverse once normalized, and sets dangerous precedent for warrantless searches. Mechanism modifier 1.3 for enforcement_action with direct constitutional impact. Scope modifier 1.2 for federal policy affecting broad population. B-score of 23.3 shows moderate hype: outrage_bait (8) generates strong emotional response around home invasion fears; media_friendliness (7) for clear civil liberties narrative; novelty (6) for explicit policy assertion; Layer 2 shows pattern_match (6) with immigration enforcement debates and narrative_pivot (5) potential. Intentionality (8) reflects deliberate policy announcement testing constitutional boundaries. Delta of +38.8 clearly exceeds +10 threshold, confirming this as substantive constitutional damage rather than distraction.