This event involves a political figure (Second Gentleman, not Vice President - title error noted) criticizing a private law firm's business decision. There is zero constitutional damage: no election interference, no rule of law violation, no separation of powers issue, no civil rights impact, no institutional capture, no corruption, and no violence. The 'information_operation' mechanism tag is misapplied - this is simply public criticism with no governmental action or constitutional dimension. B-score reaches 24.42 due to moderate outrage potential and partisan narrative framing, but falls just below the 25 threshold. However, the complete absence of any constitutional mechanism, combined with this being purely private criticism of a private business decision with no policy implications or governmental action, triggers strong noise indicators. This is intra-Democratic party positioning with zero constitutional relevance.