This event scores low on constitutional damage (A=5.0) but high on distraction/hype (B=28.4), yielding D=-23.4, clearly qualifying as List B. The A-score reflects limited constitutional impact: election interference (2) for potential impact on political communication access, separation of powers (1) for minimal institutional dynamics, and civil_rights (3) for editorial discretion over speech platforms. The information_operation mechanism adds 15% modifier. However, severity multipliers reduce impact (0.8×0.8×0.9=0.576) as this is reversible, non-durable editorial decision with limited precedent. The B-score is elevated by exceptional media_friendliness (9) - networks covering their own editorial decisions, strong outrage_bait (8) triggering partisan responses, and high pattern_match (8) to ongoing media-Trump conflict narratives. Layer 2 shows significant mismatch (7) between framing as censorship versus routine editorial judgment. Intentionality indicators include media meta-narrative (networks as story subjects), partisan framing, and outrage optimization, yielding 53% intent weight that amplifies the strategic component.