This is a textbook List B distraction event. Constitutional damage is negligible (A=0.06): flag burning is protected speech per Texas v. Johnson (1989), so no rule_of_law or civil_rights damage occurs. The minimal civil_rights score reflects only the symbolic nature of protest expression, not actual rights impact. No mechanism exists for constitutional harm. However, B-score is extremely high (26.94): outrage_bait (9/10) - flag burning is designed to provoke maximum emotional response; media_friendliness (8/10) - visual, controversial, easily covered; meme_ability (7/10) - shareable culture war content. Layer 2 shows classic distraction patterns: mismatch (8/10) - massive attention to symbolic act with zero policy impact; narrative_pivot (7/10) - shifts focus from substantive issues to culture war symbolism; pattern_match (8/10) - fits recurring 'campus radicals' narrative template. High intentionality (9/15) for symbolic provocation and predictable outrage generation. D-score of -26.88 confirms pure distraction: enormous hype about constitutionally protected activity with zero institutional impact.