A $100,000 H-1B visa fee represents significant policy change affecting immigration pathways. Constitutional drivers: election(2) - immigration policy relevant to political positioning; rule_of_law(3) - judicial validation of executive fee-setting authority creates precedent; separation(1) - minimal separation issues as within executive authority; civil_rights(3) - substantially restricts economic opportunity and mobility for foreign workers; capture(2) - potential corporate influence in restricting labor competition; corruption(1) - minimal direct corruption indicators; violence(0) - none. Base: (2×0.22+3×0.18+1×0.16+3×0.14+2×0.14+1×0.10)×5=16.68. Severity: durability(1.1) - policy can be reversed but judicial backing adds stability; reversibility(0.9) - administratively reversible; precedent(1.0) - moderate precedent for fee structures. Mechanism(1.15) for policy_change with judicial validation. Scope(1.2) for federal affecting moderate population. Final A: 23.04. B-score: Layer1(16.5/30) - moderate outrage around immigration/fees, limited meme potential, some novelty in fee amount, media-friendly controversy. Layer2(18/40) - moderate mismatch between fee impact and constitutional damage, fits immigration restriction narrative pattern. Intentionality(4/15) - policy timing and symbolic targeting evident. Final B: 16.01. Classification: A<25 threshold, routine immigration policy adjustment with judicial validation, lacks transformative constitutional mechanism despite real impact on affected population.