This is a procedural motion to force a vote on congressional stock trading bans. While it addresses legitimate corruption concerns (corruption:4, capture:3), the actual constitutional damage is minimal (A=4.8) because: (1) it's a procedural motion, not actual policy change, (2) no mechanism of constitutional harm is present - this is an attempt to strengthen ethics rules, (3) scope is narrow to Congress members only. The mechanism_modifier is 0.7 because there's no actual damage mechanism - this is preventative governance theater. B-score is moderate (18.8) due to high media appeal of 'Congress policing itself' narrative and populist framing, but lacks the viral intensity for List B threshold. This is classic procedural theater - generates headlines about reform without constitutional stakes. Classification: Noise due to A<25, no damage mechanism, and strong indicators this is symbolic political positioning rather than substantive constitutional event.