This event scores 44.68 on constitutional damage through multiple vectors: separation of powers (4) as executive branch threatens to withhold federal funds to coerce state/local educational policy decisions traditionally outside federal domain; rule of law (3) as conditional funding threats bypass normal legislative appropriations process; civil rights (3) as policy affects bodily autonomy and educational access. Resource reallocation mechanism (1.25x) applies as federal funding leverage is explicit tool. Federal scope with broad population impact (1.15x). Severity multipliers reflect moderate durability (policy easily reversed but sets precedent for federal coercion), and significant precedent value (1.15x) for using funding as cudgel against institutional health policies. B-score of 25.99 driven by high outrage potential in polarized COVID/vaccine debate (7), strong media appeal (8) as culture war flashpoint, and strategic layer showing intentional base mobilization through anti-mandate positioning. Intentionality moderate (8/15) given clear political signaling. D-score of +18.69 indicates genuine constitutional concerns exceed hype, but both scores above 25 threshold creates Mixed classification with A-list lean given stronger constitutional damage.