This event scores 11.59 on constitutional damage (A) and 38.42 on distraction/hype (B), yielding D=-26.83, clearly qualifying as List B. Constitutional impacts are real but limited: capture (3) reflects Musk's unprecedented government role and potential conflicts with federal contracts/space operations; separation (2) addresses blurred lines between private power and executive authority; election (1.5) captures potential 2026/2028 implications; corruption (1) and rule_of_law (0.5) reflect concerns about favoritism and contract integrity. Information_operation mechanism adds 15% modifier. However, the B-score dominates: Layer 1 shows exceptional media friendliness (5), high outrage bait (4.5), strong meme potential (4), and novelty (3.5) for 17 headline articles focused on personal drama. Layer 2 strategic indicators are strong: high mismatch (4) between attention and constitutional substance, narrative pivot (4) from policy to personality, and timing (3.5) during other significant events. Intentionality at 9/15 (public spectacle, personal attacks, media saturation) modulates Layer 2 to 19% weight. The feud generates massive attention while substantive questions about government contracts, conflicts of interest, and regulatory capture receive minimal analytical depth. Classic List B: high-drama distraction from structural concerns.