Federal enforcement action targeting 50+ universities creates substantial constitutional concerns through rule_of_law (4: coordinated investigations as policy enforcement tool), civil_rights (4: targeting diversity programs affects protected class considerations and academic freedom), capture (3: weaponizing federal oversight for ideological agenda), and election (3: fulfilling campaign promises through administrative action). Mechanism modifier 1.25 for enforcement_action with federal scope 1.3 affecting broad population across higher education sector. Severity: durability 1.1 (investigations create chilling effects), reversibility 0.95 (can be halted but institutional damage persists), precedent 1.15 (establishes template for ideological enforcement campaigns). Base 28.38 × modifiers = 47.67. B-score elevated by culture war framing (outrage_bait 8), media coverage of 'crusade' (media_friendliness 7), strategic mismatch between civil rights enforcement rhetoric and anti-diversity action (7), strong narrative_pivot (8) on DEI as discrimination. High intentionality (11) from coordinated scale and campaign framing increases strategic weight to 0.55. Layer1 14.3 + Layer2×0.55 15.4 = 29.93. Delta +17.74 suggests List A, but both scores exceed 25 threshold, placing in Mixed category with A-leaning characteristics.