A-score (18.16): Enforcement action targeting sanctuary city raises moderate civil_rights concerns (3.8 - due process fears, chilling effects on immigrant communities) and rule_of_law issues (3.5 - federal-local enforcement tensions, selective enforcement patterns). Separation concerns (2.5) reflect executive branch pressuring local jurisdictions. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 15% modifier. Single_state scope reduces by 15%. Severity multipliers near baseline as action is operationally reversible and follows existing legal frameworks, though creates precedent for targeted enforcement. B-score (30.63): High outrage_bait (8.5) - San Francisco as progressive icon, sanctuary city symbolism. Strong media_friendliness (8.0) - visual deployment narrative, clear conflict frame. Layer 2 shows high pattern_match (8.0) with Trump's historical sanctuary city rhetoric and mismatch (7.0) between 100 agents and actual operational necessity. Intentionality indicators strong: symbolic location (SF as resistance symbol), round number suggests messaging over operational calculation, timing fits broader immigration narrative push. Intent_weight 0.56 significantly amplifies Layer 2. D-score: -12.47 clearly indicates List B - distraction substantially exceeds constitutional damage.