This event scores high on constitutional damage (A=34.5) due to government suppression of economic data that citizens need for informed decision-making. Strong drivers: rule_of_law (4.0) for undermining transparency obligations, election (3.5) for denying voters economic information, corruption (3.5) for potential manipulation of public information, separation (3.5) for executive overreach in withholding statutorily-required data, and capture (3.0) for state control of information flows. Civil_rights (2.5) reflects impaired access to public information. Information_operation mechanism adds 1.25x modifier; federal scope with broad population adds 1.15x. Severity multipliers: precedent (1.2) for normalizing data suppression, durability (1.1) for potential lasting impact on transparency norms. B-score (26.1) is also elevated: outrage_bait (7.5) and media_friendliness (8.0) drive Layer 1 to 67.5% of max; Layer 2 strategic value at 52.5% with intentionality=8 boosting weight to 0.53. The mismatch (6.0) between shutdown justification and permanent suppression, plus timing concerns, indicate strategic elements. D-score of +8.4 places this in Mixed territory: both constitutional damage and distraction/strategic value are significant.