Expansion of existing ICE detention infrastructure through resource reallocation. Constitutional impact limited: rule_of_law(2) for enforcement expansion within statutory authority, separation(1) for executive branch operational decision, civil_rights(3) for immigration detention concerns but within established legal framework. Resource reallocation mechanism adds 15% modifier, multi-state scope adds 10%. Severity: slightly durable infrastructure investment (1.1), moderately reversible through budget/policy changes (0.95), no novel precedent (1.0). Final A=8.8. B-score elevated by outrage_bait(7) targeting sanctuary cities, media_friendliness(6) with Secretary announcement, pattern_match(7) to immigration enforcement narratives. Layer 2 shows mismatch(6) between routine facility purchase and political framing. Intentionality moderate(8) with announcement timing and city selection. Final B=17.5. Neither threshold met (A<25, B<25). Classified as Noise: routine administrative expansion of existing enforcement infrastructure presented with political framing but lacking substantive constitutional mechanism or novel legal theory.