Tariff relief expansion on specific agricultural products from Brazil represents routine trade policy adjustment with minimal constitutional implications. A-score (7.96) reflects limited institutional impact: rule_of_law (1) for executive trade authority exercise, separation (1) for unilateral executive action within delegated powers, capture (2) for potential industry/bilateral influence, corruption (1) for selective relief patterns. Policy_change mechanism adds 15% modifier, international scope 10%. Severity multipliers reduced (0.9/0.85/0.9) as tariff adjustments are easily reversible and common. B-score (8.59) driven by modest media coverage of trade policy shifts and timing during broader tariff discourse. However, A<25, no significant constitutional mechanism engaged, and event represents technical trade adjustment within normal executive authority. Three identical article titles suggest limited media diversity. Classification: Noise - routine policy implementation without constitutional damage threshold.