This is a pre-announcement of anticipated federal enforcement action in a sanctuary city. Constitutional damage is moderate: rule_of_law (3) reflects tension between federal immigration authority and local sanctuary policies but within established legal frameworks; separation (2) shows federal-local friction but no clear constitutional violation; civil_rights (2) reflects potential impact on immigrant communities but enforcement itself is legally authorized. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 15% modifier. Single_state scope reduces by 5%. Severity slightly below baseline (0.9*1.1*0.95=0.94) as this is reversible policy enforcement. A-score: 7.88. B-score is significantly higher: outrage_bait (7) and media_friendliness (8) are strong given sanctuary city politics and immigration debate polarization. Layer 2 shows mismatch (6) between announcement drama and routine enforcement authority, pattern_match (7) fits ongoing immigration narrative. Intentionality (8) evident in pre-announcement strategy, sanctuary city selection, and timing for maximum attention. Final B-score: 24.59. Delta: -16.71 strongly favors distraction classification.