Track whether this resignation actually changes vaccine policy implementation or regulatory decisions—personnel turnover matters only if it shifts institutional outcomes, not just generates headlines.
This is internal personnel drama with minimal constitutional impact—one person quitting a panel affects no governance mechanisms or rights. However, it generates significant media coverage (vaccine controversy + Kennedy name + 'sabotage' framing) during a week with genuinely high-harm events like ballot seizures and ICE airport deployments. The coverage-to-substance ratio is severely mismatched.