This is a routine judicial check on executive overreach in a single immigration case. While it represents proper separation of powers functioning (rule_of_law: 3.5, separation: 3.8), the narrow scope (single case, one individual) and reversible nature prevent significant constitutional impact. The judge rejected inadequate state secrets claims - this is courts doing their job, not a constitutional crisis. Civil_rights score modest (2.2) as it affects one person's case. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for judicial action reinforcing checks. Final A-score 11.87 falls well below threshold. B-score 7.1 reflects limited media appeal of technical procedural ruling. This is normal judicial oversight, not a distraction or constitutional damage event.