This is a routine appellate procedural denial (rehearing petition denied) in an already-adjudicated civil case. A-score: election(2) reflects Trump's candidacy status making any legal matter politically relevant but this is civil not criminal; rule_of_law(4) for judicial process functioning normally with finality being enforced; civil_rights(1) minimal as this involves individual civil tort claim resolution. Durability(1.2) as appellate denial adds finality; reversibility(0.9) as further appeals possible but unlikely. Scope narrow federal civil case. Base 11.96→11.88 final. B-score: outrage_bait(6) Trump+sexual abuse generates clicks; meme_ability(4) moderate; novelty(2) low as this is procedural step in known case; media_friendliness(7) clear headline. Layer2: mismatch(3) some amplification beyond procedural significance; timing(2) routine; pattern_match(4) fits Trump-legal-troubles narrative. Intentionality(2) routine judicial process. Final 14.74. Classification: A<25, no novel constitutional mechanism, routine appellate procedure, predictable outcome = Noise. This is normal judicial finality enforcement in civil litigation, not constitutional damage.