Florida Supreme Court decision upholding nonunanimous jury death sentences represents significant constitutional damage. Rule_of_law (4.5): directly contradicts Supreme Court precedent and fundamental jury trial principles requiring unanimity in capital cases. Civil_rights (5): profound violation of due process and Sixth Amendment rights - death penalty without unanimous jury consensus undermines bedrock criminal justice protections. Violence (3): state-sanctioned execution mechanism with reduced procedural safeguards. Separation (2): state court defying federal constitutional standards. Capture (1): potential influence of pro-death penalty constituencies. Durability 1.2 (precedent affects future capital cases in Florida), reversibility 0.9 (can be challenged federally but creates immediate risk), precedent 1.2 (establishes dangerous standard for capital punishment). Mechanism modifier 1.15 for judicial action with binding precedential effect. Scope 0.7 for single state but affects life-or-death outcomes. B-score moderate: outrage_bait 6 (death penalty + jury rights), novelty 4 (contradicts recent trends toward unanimity requirements), media_friendliness 5 (clear legal/moral stakes), but limited meme_ability 3. Layer 2 minimal - straightforward judicial ruling without obvious strategic timing. Delta +13.78 clearly indicates List A.