Noise🔒 v1

House and Senate Pass National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk

2025-09-20 · 2 sources · 92% confidence

Norm Erosion Onlyfederal · narrow

🏛 Congress👤 House👤 Senate👤 Mike Johnson#congressional_action #memorials #partisan_politics

Summary

Congress passed a resolution establishing a National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk, with some Democrats refusing to support it. This represents a partisan memorial action.

Why This Score

Congressional memorial resolutions are ceremonial, non-binding actions with zero constitutional impact. No drivers score above 0: no election interference, no rule of law violation, no separation of powers issue, no civil rights impact, no institutional capture, no corruption, no violence. The 'norm_erosion_only' mechanism fails to apply as memorial resolutions are routine congressional practice with no precedential weight. Partisan disagreement over ceremonial honors is standard political theater. B-score is minimal (5.79) - modest outrage bait from 'Shameful' framing and Democrats 'refusing to support' language, but limited viral potential. This is textbook noise: zero constitutional damage, ceremonial scope, partisan posturing over symbolic gesture.

A-Score Drivers

Election Integrity & Transfer of Power×0.22

0.0/5

Rule of Law / Due Process×0.18

0.0/5

Separation of Powers×0.16

0.0/5

Civil Rights / Equal Protection×0.14

0.0/5

Institutional Capture×0.14

0.0/5

Corruption / Self-Dealing×0.1

B-Score: Layer 1 — Hype (55%)

Outrage-bait

3.0/5

Meme-ability

2.0/5

Novelty Spike

1.0/5

Media Friendliness

2.0/5

Layer 2 — Strategic (45%)

Media-Volume Mismatch

1.0/5

Timing Overlap

Sources (2)

Shameful : Mike Johnson Shares What Was In Resolution Honoring Charlie Kirk That Many Democrats Refused To Support— dailycaller.com

House , Senate pass National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk ahead of memorial service— 1073modfm.com

IF YOU ONLY DO ONE THING

Ignore. Congressional memorial resolutions are symbolic gestures with no policy or constitutional implications. Partisan divisions over ceremonial honors represent routine political disagreement, not institutional threat. No monitoring required.