Weekly civic intelligence report ยท v2.2
The DOJ dropped its objections to an MLS PIN settlement after the commission sharing ban, reversing its enforcement position. This represents a policy shift in real estate regulation.
DOJ dropping objections to an MLS PIN settlement represents routine regulatory adjustment in real estate commission practices. Rule_of_law:2 for modest enforcement position reversal without broader legal framework impact. Capture:1 for potential industry influence on enforcement stance. Policy_change mechanism adds 15% modifier but narrow scope (real estate professionals only) reduces by 15%. Base constitutional impact 2.54*0.94=2.52 well below threshold. B-score minimal: technical regulatory matter with limited public salience, novelty:2 for policy reversal, timing:1 for post-commission-ban context. Layer1:4*0.55=2.2, Layer2:1*0.45=0.45, total 2.65. Both scores far below 25, no meaningful mechanism for constitutional damage, clearly technical regulatory noise affecting narrow industry segment.
Monitor for patterns of DOJ enforcement reversals in antitrust/competition matters that might indicate broader regulatory capture, but this isolated real estate settlement adjustment requires no constitutional alarm.