This is a high-profile diplomatic meeting with legitimate policy implications but generates disproportionate media attention. A-score: separation(1) reflects executive foreign policy authority within normal bounds; capture(2) reflects trade policy influenced by specific industry interests (farmers, manufacturers). Policy_change mechanism adds 15% modifier, international scope adds 20%. Total A=5.1. B-score: Layer1 scores high on media_friendliness(4) and novelty(3) - summit diplomacy is inherently dramatic. Layer2 shows mismatch(3) between actual constitutional impact and coverage volume, timing(4) reflects strategic scheduling, narrative_pivot(3) as trade war framing dominates. Intentionality(8) evident in coordinated messaging from both governments ('heap praise', 'all will be forgiven'). Final B=32.4. Delta=-27.3 clearly indicates List B: manufactured drama around routine diplomatic engagement with strategic messaging coordination.