Trump's Davos speech threatening tariffs scores moderate on constitutional damage (A=14.32) with limited rule_of_law concerns around executive tariff authority and regulatory capture dynamics favoring domestic interests. The policy_change mechanism and international scope provide modest modifiers. However, distraction/hype dominates (B=27.59) due to high media_friendliness of Davos setting, strong meme_ability of tariff threats, strategic timing at global elite forum, and clear intentionality in using protectionist rhetoric for domestic political consumption. D-score of -13.27 indicates this is primarily performative theater rather than substantive constitutional threat.