National Guard activation for anticipated protests represents significant constitutional concern through multiple vectors. Civil_rights (4.0): Military deployment against civilian protest activity directly implicates First Amendment assembly rights and creates chilling effects on protected speech. Rule_of_law (3.5): Preemptive military deployment without documented emergency or violence represents departure from civilian law enforcement primacy. Separation (2.5): Blurs military-civilian divide and executive overreach into protest management. Violence (2.0): Inherent escalation risk when armed military forces interface with civilian protesters. Enforcement_action mechanism warrants 1.25 modifier for direct state coercion. Single_state scope reduces to 0.85. Precedent multiplier 1.1 for normalization of military protest response. A-score: (0.22×0 + 0.18×3.5 + 0.16×2.5 + 0.14×4 + 0.14×1 + 0.10×0 + 0.06×2) × 0.99 × 1.25 × 0.85 = 30.1. B-score: Layer1 generates significant media attention (outrage_bait:7 for military-protest optics, media_friendliness:8 for visual drama, novelty:5 for state-level Guard activation). Layer2 moderate (pattern_match:5 connects to broader protest-militarization narratives). Intentionality:6 for preemptive nature suggests strategic timing. Final B: 19.5. Delta: +10.6 exceeds threshold with A>=25, qualifying as List A constitutional damage event.