Trump Cabinet Member Accused of Epstein Cover-Up

This is a textbook distraction event with zero constitutional damage. The accusation comes from an ex-GOP strategist making an ad hominem attack (Cabinet member 'isn't bright enough') rather than presenting evidence of actual wrongdoing. The mechanism is listed as 'norm_erosion_only' but there's no actual norm erosion occurring - just unsubstantiated allegations. No institutional damage, no policy change, no legal proceedings. B-score is high: combines Epstein conspiracy theories (outrage_bait 4.5), insult-based framing (meme_ability 4.0), and sensational headline (media_friendliness 4.5). Layer 2 shows massive mismatch (4.5) - headline implies cover-up evidence but content is just speculation about intelligence. High intentionality markers: partisan source, vague accusations without evidence, inflammatory framing, ad hominem attack. This is pure noise designed to generate clicks and outrage without substantive content.