Post-Dobbs state-level abortion restrictions follow predictable pattern. A-score 18.5 reflects genuine civil_rights impact (4.5) and election relevance (3.5) with policy_change mechanism (+25%) but single_state scope (-35%) limits constitutional damage. Rule_of_law (3.0) for regulatory framework changes, separation (2.5) for state legislative action. Severity multipliers: durability 1.2 (regulations can persist), reversibility 1.1 (requires legislative change), precedent 1.15 (follows post-Dobbs state pattern). B-score 18.8 driven by high outrage_bait (8.0) and media_friendliness (7.5) on abortion issue, but moderate novelty (3.0) as this is expected post-Dobbs state action. Layer 2 pattern_match (6.0) reflects predictable cycle. Intentionality 6/15 for partisan wedge issue dynamics increases intent_weight to 0.40. Both scores below 25 threshold. D-score -0.3 shows near-parity. Classification: Noise - this represents expected state-level implementation of post-Dobbs landscape rather than novel constitutional damage or manufactured distraction. Single clinic in low-population state limits scope impact despite genuine access restriction.