Monitor whether 'voluntary' AI safety reviews become de facto mandatory through procurement leverage, security clearance requirements, or regulatory pressure—and whether submitted models are used for surveillance or competitive intelligence beyond stated safety purposes.
This EO creates a voluntary framework for government pre-release access to frontier AI models, raising civil rights (surveillance potential) and institutional capture concerns (tech-government revolving door), but lacks enforcement teeth and is easily reversible. The 'voluntary' framing and IBM CEO endorsement generated substantial tech-friendly coverage during a week of higher-harm actions on voting access, whistleblower protection, and intelligence agency capture. The distraction score dominates due to media-volume mismatch and strategic timing.