Judicial skepticism of executive personnel actions creates moderate constitutional concern through separation of powers (4) and rule of law (3) dimensions. The mechanism is judicial review checking executive authority, warranting +15% modifier. However, this is early-stage skepticism without ruling, limiting durability (0.9). Capture scores 2 for potential politicization of civil service. Civil rights minimal (1) as narrow personnel matter. B-score elevated by high media friendliness (5) of 'judge skeptical' framing, pattern matching (5) to broader Trump administration legal battles narrative, and strategic timing (4) amid multiple concurrent controversies. Outrage bait moderate (4) for anti-Trump audiences. Intentionality indicators present but not dominant. Delta of -5.93 suggests slight distraction lean but neither threshold met for clear classification.