This event scores low on constitutional damage (A=2.13) but very high on distraction/hype (B=32.12), yielding D=-29.99, clearly List B. The A-score is minimal because this represents state-level policy resistance to federal action - a legitimate exercise of federalism rather than constitutional damage. Separation of powers scores 4 only for the federal-state tension, but this is normal constitutional friction. The threat is reversible, affects only California institutions, and involves standard budget leverage. The B-score is elevated due to high outrage potential (Newsom vs Trump narrative), strong media appeal (education funding + political conflict), and clear strategic positioning. Layer 2 shows high mismatch (threat appears more dramatic than actual constitutional stakes), excellent timing for resistance narrative, and strong pattern-matching to ongoing Trump-California conflicts. Intentionality indicators are strong: political branding, resistance positioning, and narrative control. This is a politically strategic move generating significant attention relative to minimal constitutional impact.