Trump Administration Reshapes Historical and Cultural Institutions

High A-score (46.1) driven by institutional capture (5/5) - systematic control of federal historical narratives across national parks and museums. Civil rights (4/5) reflects First Amendment academic freedom concerns and public access to historical information. Rule of law (4/5) for executive overreach into educational/curatorial independence. Election impact (3/5) as historical narrative control affects civic education. Policy mechanism with federal scope and broad population yields 1.3×1.2 modifiers. Durability 1.2 (institutional changes persist), reversibility 0.9 (materials can be restored), precedent 1.2 (normalizes state control of history). B-score (28.1) elevated by media friendliness (8/10) - culture war framing, outrage bait (7/10) - censorship angle. Layer 2 pattern match (8/10) fits authoritarian playbook, narrative pivot (7/10) enables 'patriotic education' discourse. High intentionality (11/15) for systematic rollout across institutions and narrative control objectives, yielding 0.55 intent weight. Delta +18 with both scores >25 = Mixed classification, though A-dominance clear. This represents genuine institutional capture with strategic amplification.