Weekly civic intelligence report ยท v2.2
Oklahoma's GOP Governor opposed sending out-of-state National Guard troops to states that do not welcome them, challenging federal deployment authority.
Governor's opposition statement challenges federal deployment authority (separation:3, rule_of_law:2) but remains purely rhetorical with norm_erosion_only mechanism (0.7 modifier). Multi-state scope provides modest elevation (1.15x) but narrow population limits impact. Base constitutional damage of 7 reduced to 6.2 after modifiers - well below List A threshold of 25. Distraction score elevated by partisan framing (outrage_bait:6), federal-state conflict narrative (media_friendliness:7), and strategic mismatch between symbolic statement and actual constitutional impact (layer2 mismatch:7). Intentionality indicators show clear partisan positioning (8/15). However, B-score of 23.4 falls just short of List B threshold. Most critically: no concrete mechanism for constitutional damage, no actual policy change, purely symbolic opposition. This is classic noise - generates media attention and partisan heat without substantive constitutional implications.
Monitor for actual policy implementation (executive orders, AG opinions, deployment refusals) that would elevate from symbolic opposition to concrete constitutional conflict. Current posture is performative federalism without teeth.