Multi-week federal shutdown represents genuine constitutional damage through separation of powers dysfunction (Congress/Executive budget impasse), rule of law degradation (failure to execute appropriations process), and civil rights impact (SNAP, heating assistance affecting vulnerable populations). A-score: election(2 - budget fights affect political positioning), rule_of_law(3 - appropriations process breakdown), separation(4 - core legislative-executive budget function failure), civil_rights(3 - essential services disrupted for vulnerable populations), capture(2 - special interest influence on spending priorities), corruption(1 - minimal direct corruption), violence(0). Base: (2×0.22 + 3×0.18 + 4×0.16 + 3×0.14 + 2×0.14 + 1×0.10 + 0×0.06) = 2.59 × 12 = 31.08. Severity: durability(0.9 - weeks-long but temporary), reversibility(0.85 - services resume when resolved), precedent(1.0 - normalized shutdown pattern). Mechanism: resource_reallocation adds 1.15 (direct service disruption). Scope: federal/broad adds 1.2. Final A: 31.08 × 0.9 × 0.85 × 1.0 × 1.15 × 1.2 = 42.89. B-score: Layer1 moderate (outrage:3, meme:2, novelty:1 - recurring pattern, media:4 - economic impact headlines) = 10/20 × 55 = 27.5. Layer2 (mismatch:2, timing:3 - budget deadline theater, narrative:2, pattern:3 - familiar shutdown dynamics) = 10/20 × 45 = 22.5. Intentionality: 6/15 (partisan negotiation, brinkmanship pattern) → weight 0.40. Final B: 27.5 + (22.5 × 0.40) = 23.90. Delta: 42.89 - 23.90 = +18.99. Classification: A≥25 (42.89) AND D≥+10 (+18.99) = List A. Real constitutional damage from appropriations failure and service disruption exceeds political theater.