Monitor for any procedural irregularities if similar requests are handled differently, but this isolated ceremonial decision requires no constitutional concern.
This is a ceremonial dispute with zero constitutional damage. The Speaker's decision to deny lying-in-honor is a discretionary ceremonial matter, not a constitutional mechanism. The 'norm_erosion_only' mechanism cannot apply because: (1) lying-in-honor is not a constitutional norm but a rare ceremonial honor granted at discretion, (2) the Speaker explicitly cited precedent for the decision, indicating norm-following rather than erosion, (3) no constitutional powers, rights, or structures are affected. A=0 because no drivers are triggered - this is purely symbolic. B=12 from moderate outrage potential around race/civil rights symbolism and media coverage of the controversy, but lacks viral elements or strong strategic indicators. The intentionality score of 3 reflects minimal strategic calculation. Classification: Noise due to A<25, no valid mechanism, and purely ceremonial nature.