Track which specific DHS functions remain operational despite 'shutdown' status—if immigration enforcement continues at full capacity while asylum processing halts, this reveals selective implementation that weaponizes the shutdown for policy goals rather than genuine fiscal crisis.
A 60-day shutdown represents genuine separation-of-powers dysfunction (Congress-Executive impasse) with real harm to federal operations, scoring moderate on constitutional damage (A=36). However, the media-friendliness of shutdown coverage, combined with strategic timing during a week packed with higher-harm actions (voting restrictions, due process violations, military deployments), elevates the distraction score (B=50). The unfunding of DHS specifically—amid aggressive immigration enforcement—suggests potential strategic leverage rather than pure budgetary gridlock.