Executive order on drone policy represents routine administrative action with minimal constitutional impact. A-score of 9.33 driven primarily by modest regulatory capture concerns (industry influence on DJI ban omission) and minor rule of law/civil rights implications around surveillance authority. Severity modifiers near baseline given reversibility and limited precedent. B-score of 15.97 reflects moderate hype from expectation mismatch (anticipated DJI ban absent), 'American Dominance' branding, and media coverage of what didn't happen. Layer 2 mismatch elevated (3) due to gap between expectations and reality. Intentionality indicators present but modest (expectation subversion, nationalist branding). Neither score reaches 25 threshold, mechanism is routine policy change affecting narrow population (drone industry/users), and constitutional damage vectors are minimal. Clear Noise classification.