This is a textbook distraction event with minimal constitutional damage. A-score: Single member of Congress making inflammatory statement about political opponent has marginal election integrity impact (1.5) and minimal rule of law concern (0.5). No institutional mechanisms affected. Low durability as social media rhetoric is ephemeral. B-score: Extremely high Layer 1 performance - maximum outrage bait (9.5), high meme-ability (8.0), strong media friendliness (9.0). Layer 2 shows strategic timing around Epstein files release (9.0), significant mismatch between rhetoric severity and actual constitutional impact (8.5), narrative pivot from document content to partisan accusation (7.5). High intentionality (11/15) with clear partisan timing, narrative hijacking, outrage optimization, and media cycle synchronization. Final B-score 40.86 vs A-score 1.43 yields D-score of -39.43, clearly List B territory.