This event scores high on constitutional damage (A=48.89) due to significant civil rights implications (4.5) - removal of protected status for students in educational settings violates established sanctuary policies and due process norms. Rule of law concerns (4.0) stem from changing enforcement protocols without clear legal framework. Election impact (3.5) reflects campaign promise implementation. Violence potential (2.5) accounts for family separation trauma and enforcement confrontations. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 1.3x multiplier; multi-state scope adds 1.15x. Severity multipliers reflect durability (1.2 - policy shift), reversibility (1.1 - requires executive reversal), and precedent (1.2 - normalizes enforcement in protected spaces). B-score (25.14) is elevated by high outrage potential (8.5) around children/schools, strong media appeal (8.0), and timing (7.5) as pre-implementation preparation narrative. Intentionality moderate (9/15) with institutional framing suggesting strategic amplification. Delta (A-B=+23.75) exceeds +10 threshold, but both scores above 25 creates Mixed classification per rules. This represents genuine constitutional concern with significant hype overlay.